|
Performance comparison
Staff/Class |
Compact car |
Until 1500cc |
Until 2000cc |
Until 2500cc |
Over 2500cc/Professional use |
F4200 |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Very good! |
F130PLUS |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Good! |
Good! |
F65 |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Very good! |
- |
- |
F330 |
Very good! |
Very good! |
Good! |
- |
- |
Mazda RX-8 Fuel cost test. 80 kilos per hour(auto cruise running)
|
Fuel cost was tested with RX-8 of Mazda. 80 kilos per hour(auto cruise
running)
The following tests resulted when having run on the same road in auto cruise
on the same condition.
- |
Mileage |
Fuel cost |
Improvement rate |
Nothing |
62.4km |
6.12L <10.04L/km> |
- |
F4200 |
62.4km |
4.99L <12.86L/km> |
22%UP!! |
|
TOYOTA Kruger 3000cc 4WD Test.80 kilos per hour(auto cruise running). |
It tested with the car of the customer who had bought F130PLUS. The customer
seems to be terribly happy! It is said that it gets good mileage the car of Toyota when it is a rumor. However, the thing that fuel cost expands further by this experiment was proven.
|
- |
Mileage |
Fuel cost |
Improvement rate |
Nothing |
62.4km |
11.59L/km |
- |
F130PLUS |
62.4km |
13.44L/km |
15%UP!! |
SUBARU SVX Comparison result of torque and horsepower |
Our company adopted the drag racing measurement system of United States Tesla Motors and California state police speed gun. And, horsepower, torque, and speed G were comparing measured.
|
Red line:F2100 (130PLUS) Blue line:Nothing
|
|
A horsepower and torque improve in the whole area when they attach F130. |
|
|
|
|